Showing 180 to 183

The Garden and the Stream

Essay (very aesthetic reading!) The Garden and the Stream: A Technopastoral

Short version notes.alexkehayias.com/the-garden-and-the-stream/

This experience has radically changed me, to the point I find it hard to communicate with a lot of technologists anymore. It’s like trying to explain literature to someone who has never read a book. You’re asked “So basically a book is just words someone said written down?” And you say no, it’s more than that. But how is it more than that?

This is my attempt to abstract from this experience something more general about the way in which we collaborate on the web, and the way in which it is currently very badly out of balance.

I am going to make the argument that the predominant form of the social web — that amalgam of blogging, Twitter, Facebook, forums, Reddit, Instagram — is an impoverished model for learning and research and that our survival as a species depends on us getting past the sweet, salty fat of “the web as conversation” and on to something more timeless, integrative, iterative, something less personal and less self-assertive, something more solitary yet more connected.

Things in the Garden don’t collapse to a single set of relations or canonical sequence, and that’s part of what we mean when we say “the web as topology” or the “web as space”. Every walk through the garden creates new paths, new meanings, and when we add things to the garden we add them in a way that allows many future, unpredicted relationships.

People say, well yes, but Wikipedia! Look at Wikipedia!

Yes, let’s talk about Wikipedia. There’s a billion people posting what they think about crap on Facebook.

There’s about 31,000 active wikipedians that hold English Wikipedia together. That’s about the population of Stanford University, students, faculty and staff, for the entire English speaking world.

No feeds

So here I am hooking up people's RSS/Atom feeds to my reMarkable #e-reader. As if the latest things they have to say are the most important?

In retrospect, it looks like a tragic attempt to get myself to actually read a bit of all these awesome folks' blogs.

I don't need a list of "great feeds", I just need a list of "great people", and their homepages. When will I mine their content to learn from it? I don't know… But when I do, I'll be able to write my own notes that link back to them where appropriate.

My garden will grow as a result of me delving into others' gardens. And that can be done any time. No more feeds, but still a "Blogroll".

What links here

Created (4 years ago)

On Autodidactism

#autodidacting

Using flashcards to memorize a memory castle of flashcards

Combination of SRS and memory castles.

For the thought experiment, instead of flashcards, suppose you have a stack of cheatsheets. You wanna memorize them. You go and put the cheatsheets in a memory castle.

In mindspace, you can alter the cheatsheets – the words are no longer confined to A4 sheets, and art can be three-dimensional and include the sense of touch.

Obama's insight about blue suits can be represented by Obama wearing a blue suit, e.g. Though the presence of a person would be overpowering, so persons should only be used for important insights. A framed Obama?

For advanced potential, perhaps add smell to different rooms – if you focus inwardly on really feeling that smell, you kind of will smell it, regardless of what your flesh nose is sensing. And then, turn your attention to the room, and it should come back more easily. To mint new memory objects, it may help to go in meatspace to smell the appropriate thing for that room.

For example… a Chinese-styled room, smelling of chai tea. Go smell some meatspace chai before even trying to envision it (because memory retcons itself, you may cause details to disappear forever).

Instead of words, you can have objects. Suppose you've read a book and written notes from it. Eventually these notes become a box of objects in your memory castle.

In meatspace SRS, you can put pictures of your memory rooms. Eventually you can even draw the objects you've created and put those drawings in SRS – along with the actual flashcards they represent! (Option: attach a random image to every flashcard, well before turning them into memory objects)

For a grace period, you practice on flashcards both on actual paper/SRS, and in mindworld.

Take care, don't create too many objects. You don't need as many flashcards as you think.

Memory objects can themselves hold memory objects. For example, in one room, you might find a Ribbing bike. On its saddle, you might find a Buddha statue. On his lap, you might find a flower. On the petals, you might find a fly. On the fly, you might find a crown. On the surface of the crown (really zoomed in), you might find a golden castle on a flat field of gold. Inside the castle, you might find a banquet. In the banquet, you will NOT find another Ribbing bike – don't reuse objects.

For true spaced repetition, try a Leitner system. Arrange your objects. Hold them, smell them – every time you handle an object. Arrange them in a system. Not necessarily numeric. Just "on that desk" is recent stuff, "upstairs on that bookshelf" is old flashcards, "in the wine cellar behind that scary vampire nest and in front of the liliputian" is some old but important stuff. Re-use things from your life. The amphitheatre, some notes on love and relationships in Momo's room, with whom you can have a conversation while you're at it. You would of course draw your imagination of Momo's room often.

Sketch, sketch, sketch. No need to sketch the memory objects in use (you can if you want), just sketch the rooms, the 'bases'.

Use emotion. Fear (the scary vampire nest) is one. A narrow bridge…

Flashcard front: Buddha Flashcard back: Buddha with rose on his lap

Flashcard front: Rose Flashcard back: Rose with a fly

etc.

Understanding political stances

In political elections, it would generally be nice if people just read the parties' promises direct from the source and avoided hearsay. When was the last time you did that? I mean their actual website on their "give me your detailed plan" page, not a flyer)? Well, people may rarely do it, but you can!

After that, if you think a party's program doesn't make sense, you could probably join their forums and simply ask them to rehash your confusion until you see where they're coming from. You should be able to play a good devil's advocate for every party, because you took the time to understand where they're coming from, even if you disagree on fundamental priorities.

Doing this will probably reveal holes in your understanding of society, both on economic topics and on how you ought to fit into society and the meaning of life itself. Be prepared that you'll have to introspect as well as study up. Then it will be clear that political debate is generally pointless with people who haven't tried to cover their own holes too: they don't know where their values come from.

Speed reading

I learned to speed-read by accident. The trick: watch movies and TV-shows without sound, then speed them up. As you get used to it, you can speed up more and more, and pretty soon you're no longer moving your eyes over every word, you're just getting the whole subtitle in one go.

Related

  • Learning
  • Incremental reading
  • spaced repetition

External links

Created (4 years ago)

Evolution

See also

A quick summary to use in passing:

[…] there is already a consensus that people are adaptation executers, not utility maximizers. Evolution gives us random adaptations which contribute to fitness (1) on average (2) in an ancient jungle.

  • nonintuitive
    • group selection
  • kin selection
    • true altruism proportional to genes shared
      • 1/2 (??) for siblings, 1/8 for cousins
  • ant workers enslave queen
  • adaptation-executers, not fitness-maximizers
  • unit of selection
    • gene, cistron, etc
    • certainly not bodies
      • disposable
      • aging is deterioration of body after reproductive years
    • not corporations or nanodevices: Corporations don't "evolve"
  • phenotypes of genes
    • vehicle
    • environment
      • a beaver dam is 'part of' the beaver
    • other vehicles
      • two species can sometimes co-evolve
      • the microbiota in a human gut
      • parasite hosts
  • can't plan ahead
    • suboptimal results: see human airways
    • retina backwards
  • evolutionarily stable state
  • an example of an unsympathetic optimization process
    • doesn't bother to anesthetize fatally wounded and dying creatures, even when their pain no longer serves any reproductive purpose, because the anesthetic would serve no reproductive purpose either
  • thou art godshatter

What links here

Created (4 years ago)

Geological eras

The Phanerozoic eon ('visible life'), the last half-billion years, is the eon from which we can find fossils. Life existed before, but did not have bones, and was probably(?) not as complex. For that reason, we often talk as if life really got started in this eon. The eon is divided into these geologic periods (first column says how many million years ago the period started):

540 Є Cambrian kambrium WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
440 S Silurian silur WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWl
490 O Ordovician ordovicium WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW;
420 D Devonian devon WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.
360 C Carboniferous karbon WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWh
300 P Permian perm WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW:
250 T Triassic trias WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
200 J Jurassic jura WWWWWWWWWWWWWWV
140 K Cretaceous krita WWWWWWWWWWc
66 Pg Paleogene paleogen WWWWH
23 N Neogene neogen Wh
3   Quaternary kvartär :

The lines interrupting the above table mark the Permian-Triassic (P-T) extinction event and the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event. There have been others, but these two are the largest, and amateur geologists can detect these lines in rock sediment.

The periods in between the two major extinctions – the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods – composed the age of dinosaurs. It is also called the Mesozoic Era ('middle life'), with the Paleozoic ('old life') coming before and Cenozoic ('new life') coming after.

Note that geology assigns specific meanings to the words eon, era and period. The Phanerozoic Eon is made up of the Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic Eras, which in turn are made up of Periods like the Triassic and Jurassic Periods. To go down another level, each Period is divided into a number of Epochs.

It is easy to remember details about the Mesozoic and Cenozoic because they bear relevance to us, because "dinosaurs are cool", because they're recent, and because they're shorter than the Paleozoic. The Paleozoic may need more deliberate memorization. There are six periods in it, abbreviated as Є O S D C P: Cambrian-Ordovician-Silurian-Devonian-Carboniferous-Permian.


The Cambrian is the time of the "Cambrian Explosion", the proliferation of a lot of new species, and is the time of the earliest fossils (with exceptions – there are some older fossils from the "Precambrian" times, usually imprints of soft tissue, not skeletons). In particular, an extinct class of animals called trilobites was very common in the Cambrian. All life was in the sea – the land was lifeless. The supercontinent Pannotia had just broken up.

The Ordovician was a time with a hundredfold as many meteor strikes compared to today. An asteroid field passing by? The sea was dominated by invertebrates, like in the Cambrian, but fish had started to evolve.

The Silurian saw the diversification of jawed and bony fish. Small plants appeared beside lakes and streams.

The Devonian has been dubbed the "Age of Fish" because fish reached substantial diversity in this period, thus beginning the age of vertebrates. It could also be called the age of forests: the lands got covered in forest (though a different kind of forest from what we're used to). No animals on land yet. The Devonian forest would've been a safe place to be for a time-traveller, it would just have been him/her and the plants. We're now at 400 Ma, so it's been over 100 million years since the Cambrian Explosion. By the middle of the period, plants evolved leaves and true roots, and by the end, the first seeds appeared.

The Carboniferous, if you have a time machine, would be the period to visit if you want to see bugs as large as cats. The period is so named because many coal beds were formed in this period – from the constant forest fires due to high oxygen levels. There were land animals, primarily amphibians (part-time water-dwellers) and arthropods (insect-likes). The insects were enormous. A fossil we've named Meganeura was basically a 70 cm wide dragonfly. The reason for such size was the record oxygen levels, 35% compared to 21% today. The continents started merging.

The Permian saw some amphibians become fulltime land-dwellers, forming the ancestors of the mammals, turtles, lepidosaurs (reptiles) and archosaurs (dinosaurs). This is partly thanks to the Carboniferous Rainforest Collapse, which gave an advantage to creatures that could handle dry conditions, over amphibians. We're now at 300 Ma, so it's been over 200 million years since the Cambrian explosion. It took that long for animals to get out of the ocean properly. There were two continents: Pangaea and Siberia, surrounded by the ocean Panthalassa. The Permian period ended with the largest mass extinction in history, the Great Dying, making extinct 90% of all species, and thus the Paleozoic Era as a whole ends.


The Triassic began after the P-T extinction event, so the period had very poor biodiversity. It took 30 million years for ecosystems to recover. This also starts the Mesozoic Era: a lot of new and different species formed to replace the lost. The supercontinent Pangaea merged all land mass.

The Jurassic

The Cretaceous


The Paleogene

The Neogene


To zoom out rather than in, the whole of the Phanerozoic Eon ('visible life'), i.e. the time from the Cambrian to present, is one of four eons in the Earth's lifetime:

  1. the Hadean Eon (4500–4000 Ma), when the Earth and Moon took shape
  2. the Archean Eon (4000–2500 Ma), when microbes appeared
  3. the Proterozoic Eon (2500–540 Ma), when oxygen appeared due the activities of some microbes, and eukaryotes appeared
  4. the Phanerozoic Eon (540 Ma to present), when large (visible to the naked eye) multicellular species became common

What links here

Created (4 years ago)
Showing 180 to 183