Showing 183 to 186

Venus

Adjective: Venerian or Venusian.

Length of a day

Look at these numbers:

  • Orbital period (Venus year): 224.7 Earth days
  • Rotation period (Venus day): -243 Earth days (retrograde)

A Venus day (the time its globe takes to rotate 360 degrees around its own axis) is longer than a Venus year (the time it takes to travel a loop the Sun)!

That's pretty damn slow, compared to Earth which manages to spin 365 revolutions before completing one orbit.

But how slowly does the Sun move across the Venus sky? That's usually what we mean when we talk about a "day".

Because of the retrograde rotation, a solar day on Venus (the time from one sunrise to the next sunrise) takes "only" 116.75 Earth days.

I wonder, if the planet's rotation was prograde like most planets, would a solar day be horribly long?

Yes. Normally, if you imagine a non-rotating body orbiting the Sun, it would see the Sun moving across its sky, but a slow prograde rotation cancels out much of that, seemingly slowing down the Sun's path across the sky. So how long would it take from one sunrise to the next?

The difference between its day and its year is about 20 Earth-days, so on every completed orbit, the planet's rotation would only have progressed 20 days, or about a twelfth, of the full 243 days. During the orbit, it was mostly "rotating along" like a tidally locked satellite. In short, if Venus rotation had been prograde, a solar day would take more than 2500 Earth days, or seven years between sunrises!

Colonization

Venus is one of the best colonization sites in our solar system.

  • While it has temperatures around 500 C on the ground, you can find more Earth-like conditions at an altitude of 55,000 m above the ground: livable temperature and pressure. These beat Mars.
    • The Venerian atmosphere is crazy-thick, so even at the 50 km altitude, there's still enough above to protect against solar radiation and meteorites. This beats Mars.
    • The atmosphere can be used to manufacture oxygen more easily than on Mars.
  • After we realize that Earth air acts as a lifting gas on Venus, it's clear that you could build cities that float in the air on Venus, same as when you let go of a helium balloon on Earth and watch it float up into the sky. Isn't that great?!
    • And the cities wouldn't need big balloons above, the way airships on Earth are made of a big balloon and only a small gondola underneath where people board. Because we can breathe that air, we can occupy the balloon itself, so to speak (rather, there'd be no balloon, just a very big gondola). That gives you plenty of space to walk around.
  • While these cities need be airproof, it won't spell doom if it springs a leak somewhere. The pressure inside the city is the same as the Venus atmosphere outside, so Venerian air would come in at normal gas-mixing rates, affording many hours for engineers to patch the leak.
  • In theory, you can even step outside on the balcony without a spacesuit and crack open a beer – all you need is a breathing apparatus in your nostrils. But stay inside when it rains; the rain is sulfuric acid strong enough to dissolve most matter.
    • Not sure if you'd ever dare expose your mouth. You know, when we hold our breath for too long, what induces us into a panic is not the absence of oxygen (the lungs consume oxygen very slowly, actually) but the rising amounts of carbon dioxide. IIRC, less than a percent CO2 is enough to cause us to hyperventilate and behave like we're drowning. On Venus, the air is closer to 100% CO2; what would it feel like to accidentally suck in some of that through your mouth? I guess you'd lose all control of your body and die shortly thereafter.
  • A major drawback is the lack of local raw materials – you'd have to send drones to the ground to gather stuff, and all drones sent by the USA and the Soviet Union in the 20th century broke in less than 2 hours under the intense heat and pressure.
    • Reycling would be a big deal.

Related

Created (4 years ago)

The Andrew Wakefield case

Published a paper in 1998 in The Lancet about the mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) vaccine that linked it to a rising incidence of autism. In 2004, Sunday Times found that he had financial conflicts of interest and stood to earn $43M per year selling test kits. In 2010, he was found to have deliberately falsified the results. Paper was retracted from The Lancet and he was barred from practising medicine. In a related legal decision, a British court held that "there is now no respectable body of opinion which supports Mr. Wakefield's hypothesis".

As is natural for cult leaders, he stays in the cult today because that's the only place he gets respect. I think this is a problem with society. We should be able to forgive and return respect to those who admit their errors.

What links here

Created (4 years ago)

John Lennon's Imagine

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us, only sky

Imagine all the people
Livin' for today
Ah

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion, too

Imagine all the people
Livin' life in peace
You

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man

Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world
You

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

What links here

Created (4 years ago)

The Garden and the Stream

Essay (very aesthetic reading!) The Garden and the Stream: A Technopastoral

Short version notes.alexkehayias.com/the-garden-and-the-stream/

This experience has radically changed me, to the point I find it hard to communicate with a lot of technologists anymore. It’s like trying to explain literature to someone who has never read a book. You’re asked “So basically a book is just words someone said written down?” And you say no, it’s more than that. But how is it more than that?

This is my attempt to abstract from this experience something more general about the way in which we collaborate on the web, and the way in which it is currently very badly out of balance.

I am going to make the argument that the predominant form of the social web — that amalgam of blogging, Twitter, Facebook, forums, Reddit, Instagram — is an impoverished model for learning and research and that our survival as a species depends on us getting past the sweet, salty fat of “the web as conversation” and on to something more timeless, integrative, iterative, something less personal and less self-assertive, something more solitary yet more connected.

Things in the Garden don’t collapse to a single set of relations or canonical sequence, and that’s part of what we mean when we say “the web as topology” or the “web as space”. Every walk through the garden creates new paths, new meanings, and when we add things to the garden we add them in a way that allows many future, unpredicted relationships.

People say, well yes, but Wikipedia! Look at Wikipedia!

Yes, let’s talk about Wikipedia. There’s a billion people posting what they think about crap on Facebook.

There’s about 31,000 active wikipedians that hold English Wikipedia together. That’s about the population of Stanford University, students, faculty and staff, for the entire English speaking world.

No feeds

So here I am hooking up people's RSS/Atom feeds to my reMarkable #e-reader. As if the latest things they have to say are the most important?

In retrospect, it looks like a tragic attempt to get myself to actually read a bit of all these awesome folks' blogs.

I don't need a list of "great feeds", I just need a list of "great people", and their homepages. When will I mine their content to learn from it? I don't know… But when I do, I'll be able to write my own notes that link back to them where appropriate.

My garden will grow as a result of me delving into others' gardens. And that can be done any time. No more feeds, but still a "Blogroll".

What links here

Created (4 years ago)
Showing 183 to 186