Showing 235 to 238

Buffering

Buffering is this wonderful trait where you can speak directly to me, and I won't hear a word.

Then you might call me out by name, and I'll say "What?", and then the contents of what you just said will start loading in my brain.

Then I will interrupt you and answer the question you asked just as you begun to repeat it.

romankogan.net/adhd/#Buffering

This happens to me. I am aware that you said something, but it's like the language centers of my brain are temporarily offline. Then they gets plugged in and suddenly it makes sense all at once.

It's one part of why conversations can be exhausting… this can happen in the middle, then I try to pretend that I am still listening but I have to keep in my memory your last sentence while I wait for it to make sense, and then catch up remembering what you said since.


Alternatively, I may have Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS). Then it may not be an issue with language processing itself, just that doing it under time pressure, such that I feel compelled to respond promptly, is one of the times I'm most likely to "log out" mentally for no reason.

What links here

Created (4 years ago)

Unit conversion

The ability to convert in your head between m/s and km/h can be useful in conversations (about astronomy, vehicle speeds, wind…).

From m/s to km/h, the multiplication factor is 3600/1000 (seconds and meters) = 36/10 = 3.6. I suppose a quick head rule is to multiply by three and then add a bit.

So 20 m/s is 72 km/h. And the speed of light 300 Mm/s is about 950 Mm/h, or 950 000 000 km/h.

From km/h, the multiplication factor is the inverse of that, 1/3.6 = 0.2777…, or if you prefer, 1000/3600 = 10/36 = 5/18. I suppose a quick head rule is to just take a fourth of the number; 0.27 is close to 0.25.

From km/h to m/s: the multiplication factor is the inverse of above, so instead of multiplying by 3.6, you divide by 3.6, or multiply by 1/3.6 = 0.2777… Or just take the fourth of the km/h number and add a bit. But I think I heard of a neater rule for this.

Notice a surface generality: always expect the km/h number to be bigger than the m/s number.

Created (4 years ago)

Being told what to do

#ADHD

I can only bear so long with being told what to do.

I absolutely can't stand the feeling of being controlled.

Tell me what you need, I'll figure out myself how to make that happen, thank you.

Oh. But also I absolutely can't estimate the time it will take me. And I will perceive any sort of nudging and reminding as being told what to do, and might blow up.

Say, you want me to make dinner by 4PM. I agree. 4PM comes, I am doing something else. You start asking me what I'm doing , tell me I promised to be cooking dinner at 4PM, tell me to start cooking, etc.

Whereas at that moment, I could be stuck either in ADHD Paralysis or False Dependency Chain. In my mind, I am cooking dinner. Though I am fixing the cats' house and paying the student loan bill at this moment, it's because it needs to be done so that I could cook dinner!

Or if I am doing nothing at all, it's on the outside, whereas on the inside the task at hand is all I am thinking of. Being told to do what you are preparing and mustering up the energy to do yourself is very hard to bear.

The compromise I'm figuring out is as follows:

  • You tell me what you want (the result, not what you want me to do or how I should do it).
  • We agree on a time
  • Crucial: develop a Plan B and tell me what you'll do if I don't start by that time. Whatever you do must work out for you. Imagine me being unable to do whatever I promised because I fell off a bike, what would you do? Decide now, and tell me. (Example: if you don't start cooking by 3:30PM, I'll go out and have dinner by myself).
  • When the time comes, either observe that I'm starting as promised, or notify me that you are initiating Plan B ("It's 3:25PM, I'm leaving in 5 minutes").

Sounds crazy? It is. But the thing is:

  • It works
  • It provides a rigid structure for me: knowing what happens if I postpone the task provides the rigid structure within which I can operate
  • It doesn't involve telling me what to do, or any control. Either I do it, or Plan B activates – either way, there are no surprises, and you are not left stranding.
Created (4 years ago)

Org-roam graphing

#slipbox

How to make the graphs look better

With the Graphviz-based org-roam-graph

  • Issue: I got an ultra-wide canvas and it's unusable!
    • You have too few connections. Make your notes more interconnected.
    • Impose a maximum width on Graphviz output
      • It's supposed to be possible and I don't know why org-roam-graph doesn't do it by default

With org-roam-ui

  • Tag "everything-nodes" so the grapher can ignore them
  • If you tag undeveloped notes with something like :stub:, you can give them a special color in org-roam-ui
  • Buggy discovery of backlinks … check issues tracker
  • For publishing to a simple blog on Jekyll/Wordpress/etc, don't be shy to just show screenshots of it as a stopgap measure

What links here

  • Publishing Org-roam notes
Created (4 years ago)
Showing 235 to 238