Showing 439 to 442

Fiction I've read

Title Author
2 Digital Fortress Dan Brown
3 Universums öde George Johansson
3 Angels & Demons Dan Brown
3 Animorphs K. A. Applegate
3 Fem  
3 Cyberia  
4 Harry Potter J. K. Rowling
4 Doubt Tonogai Yoshiki
5 Tomorrow When the War Began John Marsden
5 Dune Frank Herbert
5 Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Douglas Adams
5 Dragon Ball Akira Toriyama
5 Vinland Saga Makoto Yukimura
6 The Trial Franz Kafka
6 Turning Point  
6 Saga of Soul  
6 the SCP-verse  
6 The Two-Year Emperor David Storrs
6 Back to the Beginning  
6 The Long Ships (orig. title Röde Orm) Frans Bengtsson
6 Foundation Isaac Asimov
6 Jane Eyre Charlotte Brontë
6 Jurassic Park Michael Crichton
6 Death Note Tsugumi Ohba
6 Rationalising Death  
7 Dungeon Keeper Ami  
7 Brave New World Aldous Huxley
7 Exhalation Ted Chiang
7 I, Robot Isaac Asimov
7 Worm Wildbow
7 The Prince of Nothing R. Scott Bakker
7 Animorphs: The Reckoning  
7 Pokemon: The Origin of Species  
7 Ender's Game  
8 The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant Nick Bostrom
8 Diaspora Greg Egan
8 Momo Michael Ende
8 Cazador  
8 Debt of Blood  
8 Luminosity Hannah Blume
8 Worth the Candle Alexander Wales
8 The Last Question Isaac Asimov
8 City of Angles Stefan Gagne
8 The Curious Incident of the Dog In the Night-Time  
8 Harry Potter and the Natural 20  
9 Collected Short Stories Hannah Blume
9 2001: A Space Odyssey (book aged well, movie didn't) Arthur C. Clarke
9 Sophie's World Jostein Gaarder
9 Permutation City Greg Egan
10 Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality Eliezer Yudkowsky

Don't remember well enough to rate

  The Hobbit J. R. R. Tolkien
  Chronicles of Narnia C. S. Lewis
  Notes from the Underground Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  The Da Vinci Code Dan Brown
  The Little Prince Antoine Saint-Exupery
  The Metropolitan Man Alexander Wales
  2010: Odyssey Two Arthur C. Clarke

What links here

Created (3 years ago)

To lose the root for the tree

Your original motivation for something can be forgotten as you focus on a solution that grows ever more complex – and you act as if the solution is what you fundamentally want, because you forgot how you ended up working so hard on it.

The refrain "don't lose the root for the tree" reminds you to think of what you originally wanted and ask if there are different paths towards achieving it.

I guess the idea overlaps with the sunk cost fallacy, but it uses an active phrase (easier to apply) and is more general, covering sunk costs you forgot about. Also may remind you to do a "breadth-first search" of the solution space.

What links here

Created (3 years ago)

Book: Invisible Women

The generic male, e.g. "los" in Spanish – not only a formality. Yes, "everyone knows" women are included, but studies show that people overwhelmingly think of males. I got the impression these are pretty good studies too.

Languages come in three groups –

  1. those that weave gender into the language, like Spanish
  2. those that don't, but allow optionally specifying gender, like English and Swedish
  3. those where you can't say gender, like Finnish

Turns out that the most unequal societies belong to the first group, and the most equal belong to the second. The third may sound ideal, but they make it hard to correct for biases present in culture: in practice, because of the cultural default male, it's not like having the Spanish neologism "les", but like having the generic male "los" everywhere and lacking both "las" and "les".

What links here

Created (3 years ago)

Minimalist Core Trick

You may not self-identify as a "minimalist", but its #1 lesson is general.

Here it is: Pick what to keep, not what to discard.


There's an 80/20 principle at work in most areas of life. For example, when decluttering, it's obvious which are the worst 20% and the best 20% of any collection, while the stuff in the middle takes effort to classify, sometimes extensive soul-searching.

If you try to declutter by looking specifically for "what you don't need", you'll wind up throwing away 20% and then of what's left, 20%, and then 20% of that, and so on.

Out of the original collection, the absolute fraction you keep slowly drops from 80% to 70% to 65%… in a process much slower than the opposite: picking out "what you definitely want to keep". Then right off the bat, the absolute fraction is down to 20%. This skips a lot of navel-gazing and soul-searching.


A different application: when cleaning your To-Do list, don't analyze each and every item, don't decide whether or not they still need doing. Just pick the few items you definitely, clearly need to do, copy them over to a new list, and forget about the rest.

What links here

Created (3 years ago)
Showing 439 to 442