Showing 245 to 248

Ledger CLI

Cheatsheets/TILs

How to track physical cash in Ledger?

Should you track cash as "Assets:Cash"? Actually no.

I used to do this, try to track the difference between what I knew I'd paid with cash and the amount that had apparently left my wallet, chalking it up to "Expenses:Lost cash", but you get this for free if you track all cash as "Expenses:Cash" instead.

That is, you take out cash at the ATM, and view that as a purchase of cash bills. So it's already an expense. Then, if you want, you write down what you use the cash for, which just shuffles money from one expense account to another, like this:

2019-12-01 * "Willys"           ;
    Expenses:Groceries                           145 SEK
    Expenses:Cash

That way, the "cash" expense shrinks and the "groceries" expense grows. The amount still remaining in Expenses:Cash after you've written down all purchases you remember is the unaccounted-for portion, or what I called "Lost cash".

Maybe it's still in your wallet and you haven't used it yet, maybe you've dropped it, maybe you bought something you forgot.

Maybe it doesn't matter. If you decide ahead of time that most of your cash should go to groceries, you can just… leave it in "Expenses:Cash" since you know what it means anyway.

Created (2 years ago)

Public domain music

Info

Downloads

LibriVox is just for ancient books

Created (2 years ago)

Angels

See also Fun Bible parts

  • Gabriel
  • Michael
  • Azrael
  • Uriel
  • Raphael

Other angelic appearances reveal a startling being. Angels are found saying, "Do not be afraid," to calm those to whom they appeared (Luke 1:11-13). In Luke 2 the shepherds saw angels singing to announce the birth of Jesus and were afraid. The appearance of angels at the tomb of Jesus caused Roman soldiers to "become like dead men" (Matthew 28:4).

It's also worth noting that they were apparently extremely terrifying to look at; they almost always preface anything they have to say with the remark "Do not fear", owing to the fact that they most often resemble something out of a work by H.P. Lovecraft.

Ezekiel 1:6–1:17:

Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a man.

And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.

And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a calf's foot: and they sparkled like the colour of burnished brass.

And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.

Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward.

As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion, on the right side: and they four had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle.

Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; two wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their bodies.

And they went every one straight forward: whither the spirit was to go, they went; and they turned not when they went.

As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and out of the fire went forth lightning.

And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a flash of lightning.

Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.

The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one colors. likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

Created (2 years ago)

Priors

Bayesian methods, Hyperpriors

Why use priors? People who are used to frequentist statistics sometimes feel bothered by priors. It helps to realize that all new knowledge is anyways influenced by other knowledge that we have. The Duhem-Quine thesis ("confirmation holism") says that no individual statement can be confirmed or disconfirmed by a test, only a set of statements can.

Put differently, if you were to use a frequentist paper as evidence for anything, you're implicitly using that background knowledge anyway, assumptions the researcher baked in without telling you, so if they specify prior beliefs, then that simply makes the research more honest and useful to you.

The paper may also contain a Sensitivity analysis: showing the influence of different priors on the conclusion.

A researcher may gather reasonable priors by way of Expert elicitation and/or Systematic review.

Created (2 years ago)
Showing 245 to 248